January 2024* : Thirty fifth consecutive month of top decile performance**, upside capture*** 115%, downside capture*** 58%

* Period ending  31st January, 2024   ** Among multicap PMSes for five year period *** Five year Period

In the month of January, the benchmark S&P BSE 500 TRI has grown by 1.9%.  Against that, Sameeksha PMS (Portfolio Management Service = Separately Managed Accounts) gained 3.4% (net of all fees and expenses) while having cash levels of 7.6% at start of the month and 5.7% at the end of the month.  Sameeksha AIF  (Alternative Investment Fund = “Hedge Fund”)  also gained 3.4% (post fees and expenses), indicating outperformance.

We summarize key aspects of our performance as follows: 

 

Sr. No.

Vehicle

Particulars

Summary of our performance 

1.

PMS

Aggregate
portfolio returns till date
3

(Refer Table 1, Table 2 and Figure 1)

  • From inception1 till date3, Sameeksha PMS has delivered an average annualized alpha of 8.1%.
  • For the five year and three year periods4. Sameeksha PMS has delivered annualized returns of 33.3% and 32.1% respectively.
  • For the five year and three year periods4 Sameeksha PMS has delivered annualized alpha of 18.5% and 21.9% respectively.               
2.

AIF

Aggregate
fund returns till date
3

(Refer Table 10, Table 11 and Table 12)

  • From inception2 till date3, Sameeksha AIF has delivered annualized returns of 31.3% and an annualized alpha of 15.4%.
3.

PMS

Fund
performance on a rolling periods basis

(Refer
Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5)

  • Five year rolling periods since inception
    • Alpha delivered 100% of the time (i.e 35 out of 35 observations)
    • Median alpha ~ 7%
  • Three year rolling periods since inception
    • Alpha delivered 97% ofmthe time (i.e 56 out of 58 observations)
    • Median alpha ~ 9%        
  • For the rolling five year periods (35 observations), we have been in the Top Quartile and Top Decile 100% of the time. 
  • For the rolling three year periods (58 observations), we have been in the Top quartile 93% of time and Top Decile 60% of the time. 
4.

PMS

Risk
Adjusted Ratios: Lower risk, Higher Return

(Refer
Table 6)

  • We have delivered superior three and five year risk adjusted returns as indicated by Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, and Information ratio as well as greater than 100% upside capture versus far below 100% downside capture. 
5.

AIF

Risk
Adjusted Ratios: Lower risk, Higher Return

(Refer
Table 13)

  • We have delivered superior since inception and one year risk adjusted = returns as indicated by Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, and  Information ratio as well as greater than 100% upside capture versus far below 100% downside
    capture. We however caveat that with the  short tenure (just under two years) of our AIF. 

6.                  
 

PMS

PMS
Universe rankings

(Refer
Table 7)

  • Among multicap PMSes reporting their performance to PMS Bazaar and having AUM of more than INR 100 crs, Sameeksha is ranked 2nd out of 63 funds for the performance over the five year period and 15th out of 84 PMSes for the performance over the three year period4.
  • Further, among multicap PMSes disclosing their names and performance on the website of Association of Portfolio Managers of India (APMI) and having AUM more than INR 100 crs, Sameeksha is ranked 2nd out of 61 funds for the performance over the five year period4

7.

AIF

AIF
Universe rankings

(Refer
Table 14)

  • Among Long Only Category III AIFs reporting their performance to PMS Bazaar, Sameeksha is ranked 8th out of 59 AIFs, and is  in 9th Decile for one year period4.

8. 

PMS

Returns
of Individual portfolios

(Refer
Figure 2)

  • As Sameeksha PMS does not follow a model portfolio approach, tracking individual client performance becomes more relevant. 
  • All the clients with an age of account from less than six months to more than seven years have realized annualized alpha, with an average of 10%
  • About 64% of our assets under management can be attributed to clients who have a tenure of seven years or more with us.

 9.

PMS

Performance
across pre, during and post Covid periods

(Refer
Table 8)

  • Between June 30, 2022 till date3, (Post Covid Period) delivered annualized alpha of 17.1%
  • Between February 29, 2020 and June 30, 2022, (Covid Period) delivered annualized alpha of 8.3%
  • From inception (1st April 2016) till February 29, 2020 (Pre-Covid Period), delivered annualized alpha of 3.1%

10.

PMS

Portfolio
performance on a Financial Year basis and Calendar Year basis
 

(Refer
Figure 3 and Figure 4)

  • Delivered alpha (outperformance over the benchmark5) in six
    out of eight financial years including the current incomplete FY2024. 
  • Aggregate annual alpha over all the eight financial years ~ 65.1% 
  • Delivered alpha (outperformance over the benchmark5) in six
    out of nine calendar years including the current incomplete CY2024. 
  • Aggregate annual alpha over all the nine calendar years ~ 66.8%     

1. Inception is 01/04/2016  2. Inception is 10/02/2022 3. As on 31st January, 2024 4.Period ending 31st January, 2024 5. Benchmark is BSE500TRI 

 PMS Performance and other details

Three important things must always be kept in mind when looking at performance data. First, for funds such as ours that do not follow model portfolio strategy, the performance of individual clients for different duration is important to look at. Second, some PMSes may be charging fees outside the PMS and hence after fees, performance data may not be comparable to ours. Third, it is important to look at not only portfolio returns but also risk adjusted ratios. We provide data to address all three points later in this note.

Aggregate Portfolio Returns over various time periods

Sameeksha PMS has delivered a substantial aggregate annual alpha of 65.1% over BSE500 TRI over the eight financial years (including the current incomplete financial year) implying an average alpha of 8.1% since inception (Table 1).

Table 1: Key data on alpha generation over eightfinancial years since inception1

Key Indices

Aggregate alpha generated %

Average alpha generated%

% times alpha generated over 8 FYs

BSE500 TRI

65.1

8.1

75%

1. Inception Date 1/4/2016 2. Current financial year upto 31st January, 2024

 

It is important to note that we have maintained relatively higher levels of cash (13.1% on average over the entire period from inception) from time to time over the duration of managing the portfolio. Notwithstanding the same, from inception, over five years  and over three years respectively, we have generated returns of 24.0%, 33.3% and 32.1% in INR terms and 20.5%, 29.3% and 26.5% in USD terms thus generating substantial alpha over the  Indian benchmark BSE500 TRI returns and SPY ETF (ETF tracking US S&P 500 index), respectively. Also, we have delivered strong returns relative to benchmark across various key time periods (Table 2 and Figure 1).


Table 2: Portfolio performance since inception

Period

Portfolio Return % (INR) 1 2 (A)

Benchmark Returns4 % (B)

Alpha vs the Benchmark4%
(A-B)

Portfolio Returns % (USD) (C)

US Market5 % (D)

Alpha vs US Market5 %
(C-D)

Average Cash Levels

Since
inception
3

24.0

16.9

7.2

20.5

11.4

9.1

13.1

5 Years

33.3

18.5

14.8

29.3

12.3

17.0

9.3

3 Years

32.1

21.9

10.3

26.5

9.3

17.3

10.9

2 Years

26.1

16.5

9.6

19.5

3.6

15.9

10.4

1 Year

58.1

33.4

24.7

55.7

20.5

35.1

9.0

6 Month

26.4

16.2

10.2

25.1

5.5

19.6

11.7

3 Month

16.6

17.9

-1.3

16.9

15.5

1.5

10.2

1 Month

3.4

1.9

1.5

3.7

2.2

1.5

5.7

1. Post Fees and Expenses, 2. Aggregate Portfolio , 3. From inception (1/4/2016) till 31st January, 2024 4. S&P BSE500TRI 5. SPY ETF

Aggregate Portfolio Performance and ranking on a rolling periods basis

Rolling returns are a more useful indicator of consistency in performance versus single period returns. For rolling three year periods applicable to our entire operating history, Sameeksha PMS has delivered aggregate annualized alpha 97% of the times (56 out of 58 observations) ranging from 0.4% to 23%. For the rolling five year periods applicable, Sameeksha PMS has delivered aggregate annualized alpha 100% of the time (35 out of 35 observations) ranging from 5% to 16% (Table 3).

Table 3: Number of times alpha1 generated over rolling five and three year periods

Particulars

Rolling Five Year periods

Rolling Three Year periods

Number of observations 2

35

58

Number of times alpha generated

35

56

% times alpha generated

100%

97%

Median annualized alpha

7%

9%

Maximum annualized alpha

16%

23%

Minimum annualized alpha

5%

0.4%

1. For this calculation, alpha is calculated over BSE500 TRI

For rolling three year periods applicable to our entire operating history, we have been ranked among the multicap universe in the Top Decile 60% of the time (35 out of 58 observations) and in the Top Quartile 93% of the time (54 out of 58 observations). For the remaining 7% observations, we were ranked in the Second Quartile (Tables 4 and 5).  For rolling five year periods applicable to our entire operating history, we have been ranked among the multicap universe in the Top Decile 100% of the time (35 out of 35 observations).

Table 4 : Decile distribution of our rank within the Multicap
PMS universe on a rolling basis since April 2019

Particulars

Five years

Three years

One year

Number of Observations

35

58

58

Top Decile1

100%

60%

45%

9th Decile2

0%

29%

22%

8th Decile

0%

7%

12%

7th Decile

0%

2%

2%

6th Decile

0%

2%

7%

5th Decile

0%

0%

3%

4th Decile

0%

0%

5%

3rd Decile

0%

0%

3%

Total

100%

100%

100%

1. Top Decile = in top 10%,  outperformed 90% of the funds 2.. 9th Decile = in top 20%, outperformed 80% of the funds

Table 5: Quartile distribution of our rank within the Multicap PMS universe on a rolling basis since April 2019

Particulars

Five Years

Three Years

One Year

No. of Observations

35

58

58

Top Quartile 1

100%

93%

74%

2nd Quartile 2

0%

7%

19%

3rd Quartile

0%

0%

3%

4th Quartile

0%

0%

3%

Total

100%

100%

100%

1. Top Quartile = in the top 25%, i.e. outperformed 75% of the funds 2. 2nd Quartile = in the top 50% i.e. outperformed 50% of the funds

Risk Adjusted Ratios: Not all returns are the same, Higher Returns at lower Risk  

When compared on a risk adjusted basis, our PMS has shown an even stronger performance. The Information Ratio(IR) measures the excess return of a portfolio over a benchmark per unit of active risk. A higher Information Ratio suggests better risk-adjusted performance.The higher five year IR  indicates better performance over the longer period in comparison to the IR in the 3 year period. The Sortino ratio measures the risk-adjusted return of an investment, focusing only on the downside risk. A higher Sortino ratio indicates better risk-adjusted returns, particularly with respect to downside risk. 

Moreover, Upside Capture measures how well a fund performs as compared to a benchmark when the benchmark has positive returns. A higher upside capture ratio (> 100%) indicates that the fund captures more of the benchmark’s positive movements. Whereas, Downside Capture measures how well a fund performs compared to a benchmark when the benchmark has negative returns. A lower downside capture ratio (< 100%) indicates that the fund preserves capital better during market downturns. 

Furthermore, other risk-adjusted returns – Sharpe ratio is also significantly higher (Table 6).  

Table 6: Risk Adjusted Performance Ratios

Performance Indicator

5 Year

3 Year

Sharpe Ratio

1.2

1.7

Information Ratio (IR)

1.7

1.3

Sortino Ratio

2.0

4.0

Upside Capture

115%

107%

Downside Capture

58%

43%

1. As of 31st January, 2024 2. S&P BSE500TRI

 

Performance within the PMS Universe

We continue to maintain our top rankings both within the multicap PMS universe as well as the entire PMS universe for key periods of three and five years. The multicap PMS universe rankings are more relevant to us since we follow the multicap strategy.

In the interest of a fair comparison, we present our rankings among those multicap PMSes with AUM more than INR 100 crs. Within this universe, we are 2nd out of 63 PMSes for the five year period  and  15th out of 84 PMSes for three year period, highlighting our superior performance over the long term periods (Table 7). Among the multicap universe (considering all AUM), we are consistently ranked in the Top Decile for the five year period for all 35 out of 35 observations reflecting well on the consistency of our performance.

Table 7: Comparison with PMS Multicap Universe as of 31st January 2024

Fund or Category / Returns Generated 1 2

Five year (%)

Three year (%)

Two year (%)

One year (%)

Sameeksha PMS

33.3

32.1

26.1

58.1

Multicap Universe Average

20.8

24.6

18.3

43.1

Decile Rank within the Multicap Universe

Top Decile

9th Decile

9th Decile

9th Decile

Percentile Rank within the Multicap Universe

Top 2%

Top 17%

Top 17%

Top 16%

Rank within the Multicap Universe 3 4 5 6

2nd out of 63

15th out of 84

16th out of 93

15th out of 93

1. Post fees and expenses 2. Aggregate Portfolios 3. 63 Funds 4. 84 Funds 5. 93 Funds 6. 93 Fund

Returns of Individual Portfolios 

Because we don’t follow model portfolio strategy, the performance of individual clients is far more important than overall portfolio aggregate returns  (Figure 2). For investors who are with us for 3 years and more, Sameeksha PMS has returned a very substantial alpha with an average annualized alpha of approx. 9.1% for the three year period ending 31st January, 2024. Similarly, for investors who are with us for 5 years or more, Sameeksha PMS has returned substantial alpha with an average annualized alpha of approx. 15.1% for the five year period ending 31st January, 2024.  The Figure below shows the average annualized returns and alpha over different periods of time of all the clients as on 31st January, 2024


Performance Of PMS Over The Covid Timeline (Pre, During, And Post) 

The Covid Pandemic induced significant volatility in the equity markets. Hence, it is useful to look at the performance across three time slices : Pre Covid, During Covid and Post Covid. Sameeksha PMS has outperformed the benchmark across all of these three time periods with meaningful alpha (Table 8). This consistency of performance may be an important factor in comparing us with the other funds.

 

Table 8: Absolute and Annualised returns1 – Pre, During, and Post Covid

Duration

Absolute Portfolio Returns(%)

 (A)

Absolute Benchmark Returns2 (%)

 (B)

Alpha % 

(A-B)

Annualised Portfolio Returns (%)

 (C)

Annualised Benchmark Returns2 (%)

 (D)

Alpha % 

(C-D)

01.07.2022 to 31.1.2024 (Post Covid)

82.2

49.6

32.6

46.1

29.0

17.1

01.03.2020 to 30.06.2022 (During Covid)

76.0

50.4

25.6

27.5

19.1

8.3

01.04.2016 to 29.02.2020 (Pre Covid)

67.6

50.6

17.0

14.1

11.0

3.1

1. Post fees and expenses 2. S&P BSE500TRI

Aggregate Portfolio Performance on a financial year and calendar year basis

For the month of January, Sameeksha PMS has outperformed the benchmark BSE 500 TRI by generating 3.42% returns against the benchmark BSE500TRI returns of 1.92%.  For Financial Year 2023-24 till date, we have outperformed BSE500 TRI by 24.0%. Looking at our performance over the financial years (Figure 3), we have outperformed our benchmark in six out of eight financial years (including the current incomplete financial year). Key however is that the sum of outperformance of 74.9% in those six years far exceeds the sum of underperformance of 9.8%  in the remaining two  years. Furthermore, if we are able to sustain the outperformance achieved so far in this financial year for the rest of the year, it will become a streak of five consecutive years of generating alpha.

 


 

For the calendar year 2024, we are outperforming the benchmark BSE500 TRI by 1.5%. We have outperformed the benchmark in six out of nine calendar years and the sum of outperformance of 83.3% in six years far exceeds the sum of underperformance of 16.5%  in the remaining three  years. (Figure 4)


It is important to note that we delivered this alpha despite maintaining an average cash level of 13.1% across the eight financial years.

Cumulative Performance versus the benchmark

Sameeksha PMS’s outperformance over its benchmark has continued to widen positively over the years. An investment of Rs. 100 with us since inception (April 2016) would have grown to Rs. 541 , far outpacing what one would have earned by investing in a fund that achieved benchmark returns (Figure 5). 


Analyzing the sector performance during the month

During the month, sectors that showed growth in the indices include Crude Oil, IT, Healthcare and Automobile & Ancillaries. For Sameeksha PMS, Bank, Finance, Healthcare and Media & Entertainment sectors were major outperformers compared to the benchmark. However, what hurt us is the lack of sufficient exposure towards the Telecom and Power where we missed out on participating in the upturn. Below is the attribution analysis for the month of January 2024  (Table 9).  

Table 9: Sectorwise Attribution Analysis for the month ending January 2024

Sector

Portfolio Contribution

Benchmark Contribution1

Difference

Bank

0.88%

-1.21%

2.09%

Finance

1.82%

0.18%

1.64%

Healthcare

0.71%

0.35%

0.36%

Media & Entertainment

0.29%

-0.06%

0.35%

FMCG

0.00%

-0.34%

0.34%

Retailing

0.11%

0.02%

0.09%

Electricals

0.00%

-0.04%

0.04%

Iron & Steel

-0.02%

-0.05%

0.03%

Plastic Products

0.00%

-0.02%

0.02%

Gas Transmission

0.07%

0.06%

0.01%

Alcohol

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Ratings

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Miscellaneous

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Paper

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Abrasives

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Diamond & Jewellery

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Ship Building

0.00%

0.01%

-0.01%

Hospitality

0.07%

0.08%

-0.01%

Diversified

0.00%

0.01%

-0.01%

Non – Ferrous Metals

0.00%

0.02%

-0.02%

Agri

0.00%

0.02%

-0.02%

Trading

0.04%

0.06%

-0.02%

Business Services

0.00%

0.02%

-0.02%

Consumer Durables

0.00%

0.03%

-0.03%

Textile

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Mining

0.00%

0.03%

-0.03%

Construction Materials

0.00%

0.04%

-0.04%

Inds. Gases & Fuels

0.00%

0.04%

-0.04%

Aviation

-0.06%

0.00%

-0.06%

Capital Goods

-0.01%

0.06%

-0.07%

Automobile & Ancillaries

0.19%

0.27%

-0.08%

Infrastructure

0.00%

0.09%

-0.09%

Logistics

0.00%

0.11%

-0.11%

Insurance

-0.17%

-0.02%

-0.15%

IT

0.35%

0.50%

-0.15%

Realty

-0.06%

0.10%

-0.16%

Telecom

0.00%

0.23%

-0.23%

Power

0.00%

0.25%

-0.25%

Chemicals

-0.71%

-0.25%

-0.46%

Crude Oil

0.00%

0.90%

-0.90%

1. BSE500TRI

AIF Performance and other details

Aggregate Fund Returns over various time periods
Since inception, we have maintained relatively higher levels of cash (19.7% on average over the entire period from inception) from time to time over the duration of managing the fund. Notwithstanding the same, from inception and over one year, we have generated returns of  31.3% and 59.0% in INR terms and 25.2% and 56.5% in USD terms beating the benchmark BSE500 TRI returns and ETF tracking S&P 500 index, respectively after fees before taxes. (Table 10).

Table 10: Sameeksha AIF performance in different periods since inception

Particulars

Fund Returns12 % (INR) 

(A)

Benchmark Returns4

(B)

Alpha vs the Benchmark 4% (A-B)

Fund Returns % (USD)

 (C)

US Market5 (%) (D)

Alpha vs US Market5(%) (C-D)

Average Cash level%

Since inception 3

31.3

15.9

15.4

25.2

3.7

21.5

19.7

1 year

59.0

33.4

25.5

56.5

20.5

36.0

6.7

6 Months

26.4

16.2

10.2

25.1

5.5

19.7

7.7

3 Months

16.4

17.9

-1.5

16.7

15.5

1.2

8.5

1 Month

3.4

1.9

1.5

3.6

2.2

1.5

2.8

1. Post Fees and Expenses, 2. Aggregate Portfolio , 3. From Inception (1/4/2016) till 31st January, 2024 4. S&P BSE500TRI 5. SPY ETF

Aggregate Fund Performance on a financial year and calendar year basis

For the month of January, Sameeksha AIF has outperformed the benchmark BSE 500 TRI by generating 3.4% returns against the benchmark BSE500TRI returns of 1.9%.  Looking at our performance over the financial years (Table 11), we have outperformed our benchmark in FY 2023 and we continue to outperform in the current incomplete FY 2024. For the financial year 2024 till date, we have positioned ourselves well by outperforming the benchmark BSE500 TRI by 22.6%.

Table 11: Financial year wise fund performance since inception

Particulars

Portfolio Returns3 %

Benchmark Returns4 %

Alpha vs the Benchmark4 %

FY241

59.3

36.7

22.6

FY232

5.4

-0.9

6.3

1. From 1st April, 2023 to 31st January, 2024 2. Since Inception (10/02/2022) till 31st March, 2023 3.  Post Fees Pre Tax  4. S&P BSE500TRI

 

For the calendar year 2024, we have outperformed the benchmark BSE500 TRI by 1.5%. Despite being a new fund, we were still able to produce alpha for calendar years 2022 and 2023 and outperformed the benchmark BSE500 TRI by 27.7%. (Table 12)

Table 12: Calendar year wise fund performance since inception

Particulars

Portfolio Returns2 %

Benchmark Returns3 %

Alpha vs the Benchmark %

CY241

3.4

1.9

1.5

CY23

54.2

26.5

27.7

CY224

7.5

3.8

3.6

1. From 1st January, 2024 to 31st January, 2024  2.  Post Fees Pre Tax  3. S&P BSE50TRI 4. Since inception (10/02/2022) till 31st December, 2022

 
Risk Adjusted Ratios

 

When compared on a risk adjusted basis, our PMS has shown an even stronger performance. The Information Ratio (IR) measures the excess return of a portfolio over a benchmark per unit of active risk. A higher Information Ratio (IR) suggests better risk-adjusted performance. The Sortino ratio measures the risk-adjusted return of an investment, focusing only on the downside risk. A higher Sortino ratio indicates better risk-adjusted returns, particularly with respect to downside risk. 

Moreover, Upside Capture measures how well a fund performs as compared to a benchmark when the benchmark has positive returns. A higher upside capture ratio (> 100%) indicates that the fund captures more of the benchmark’s positive movements. Whereas, Downside Capture measures how well a fund performs compared to a benchmark when the benchmark has negative returns. A lower downside capture ratio (< 100%) indicates that the fund preserves capital better during market downturns. 

Furthermore, other risk-adjusted returns – Sharpe ratio is also significantly higher (Table 13). 

Table 13: Risk Adjusted Performance Ratios

Performance Indicator

Since Inception

One Year

Sharpe Ratio

0.5

1.2

Information Ratio (IR)

1.7

3.1

Sortino Ratio

1.5

5.2

Upside Capture

95%

118%

Downside Capture

12%

-85%

1. Since inception ( 10.02.2022) to 31st January, 2024 2. S&P BSE500TRI 

 

Performance within the AIF Universe

 

We present our rankings among Long Only Category III AIFs. For the period ending 31st January, 2024, we are ranked 8th out of 59 AIFs  (Table 14), or 9th Decile. Because there is a lot of divergence in the way funds report their returns (post exp & tax; post exp, pre tax; gross returns; and post exp & tax pre perf. fees & tax) , we are doing comparison on a gross return basis to cover the entire applicable universe of funds.

Table 14 :Comparison of Sameeksha AIF with Long Only AIFs

Returns Generated

1 year

Sameeksha AIF

63.2%

Average

43.3%

Median

42.3%

Median Among Top 5 AIFs

58.4%

Sameeksha AIF Rank within the Multicap Category

8th out of 59

Sameeksha AIF Decile1 Rank within the Universe

9th Decile

Sameeksha AIF Percentile Rank

Top 12%

1. Top Decile = in top 10%, outperformed 90% of the funds, 9th Decile = in top 20%, outperformed 80% of the funds

Cumulative Performance versus the benchmark

Sameeksha AIF’s outperformance over its benchmark has continued to widen positively since inception. An investment of Rs. 100 with us since inception (Feb 10,2022) would have grown to Rs. 171, far outpacing what one would have earned by investing in a fund that achieved benchmark returns (Figure 6).


Analyzing the sector performance during the month

During the month, sectors that showed growth in the indices include Crude Oil, IT, Healthcare and Automobile & Ancillaries. For Sameeksha AIF, Bank, Finance, FMCG and Media & Entertainment were major outperformers compared to the benchmark. However, what hurt us is the lack of sufficient exposure towards the Telecomand Power where we missed out on participating in the upturn. Below is the attribution analysis for the month of January 2024 (Table 15).  

 

Table 15: Sectorwise Attribution Analysis for the January, 2024

Sector

Portfolio Contribution

Benchmark Contribution1

Difference

Bank

0.81%

-1.21%

2.02%

Finance

1.51%

0.18%

1.33%

FMCG

0.01%

-0.34%

0.35%

Media & Entertainment

0.25%

-0.06%

0.31%

Healthcare

0.51%

0.35%

0.16%

Retailing

0.10%

0.02%

0.08%

Iron & Steel

-0.01%

-0.05%

0.04%

Electricals

0.00%

-0.04%

0.04%

Hospitality

0.11%

0.08%

0.03%

Gas Transmission

0.08%

0.06%

0.02%

Plastic Products

0.00%

-0.02%

0.02%

Alcohol

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Ratings

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Miscellaneous

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Paper

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Textile

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Abrasives

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Diamond & Jewellery

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Ship Building

0.00%

0.01%

-0.01%

Aviation

-0.01%

0.00%

-0.01%

Diversified

0.00%

0.01%

-0.01%

Non – Ferrous Metals

0.00%

0.02%

-0.02%

Agri

0.00%

0.02%

-0.02%

Business Services

0.00%

0.02%

-0.02%

Trading

0.03%

0.06%

-0.03%

Consumer Durables

0.00%

0.03%

-0.03%

Mining

0.00%

0.03%

-0.03%

Construction Materials

0.00%

0.04%

-0.04%

Inds. Gases & Fuels

0.00%

0.04%

-0.04%

Capital Goods

-0.02%

0.06%

-0.08%

Insurance

-0.10%

-0.02%

-0.08%

Infrastructure

0.00%

0.09%

-0.09%

Logistics

0.00%

0.11%

-0.11%

Automobile & Ancillaries

0.14%

0.27%

-0.13%

Realty

-0.05%

0.10%

-0.15%

IT

0.31%

0.50%

-0.19%

Telecom

0.00%

0.23%

-0.23%

Power

0.00%

0.25%

-0.25%

Chemicals

-0.54%

-0.25%

-0.29%

Crude Oil

0.00%

0.90%

-0.90%

 1. BSE500TRI

 

Disclaimer – The information contained in this update is provided by our fund accounting platform and is not audited.